Review: Topaz Remask 2
December 8th, 2009 | Published in Featured, Reviews, Software Reviews | 5 Comments

Topaz Remask 2 gives great results, fast and easy.
Topaz Labs is primarily known for their low-priced alternative to the $600 Lucis Art filter. It’s called Topaz Adjust, and sells for a mere $50. Now Topaz has released the second version of Remask, their low-price alternative to the overpriced masking tools on the market, and it looks like a real category killer. It’s incredibly fast, easy to use (once you figure it out), and dirt cheap compared to everything else out there: Topaz Remask 2 is $69.99. This review will show how Remask 2 stands up to several alternative masking tools, including those delivered with Photoshop and Vertus Fluid Mask 3. We’ll finish up with a quick-start guide, so you can download the trial version and get right to work.

The ultimate masking test!

Results obtaining using the Green channel as a mask. Not bad, but not good, either.
The other Photoshop method we’ll look at is the Extract filter (which Adobe unfortunately dropped from CS4). As we’ll see, you use Topaz Remask 2 very much like you do (or did) Extract: just draw an outline to tell the software where the edge of your mask goes. Easy as pie. Luckily, Topaz’s version does a much better job than Adobe’s (below).

Without getting into some serious tweaking, here's what Photoshop's Extract filter gave me.
A while back, I invested well over $200 in a masking tool called Fluid Mask 3, from Vertus. Perhaps the fault lies with me, but the fact remains I’ve never been able to use Fluid Mask effectively. For a difficult image such as this one, Fluid Mask requires about six steps. The work flow is completely unlike anything else, and the learning curve is steep. If you are a serious professional retouch artist, you may find it to be a powerful tool. For someone like me, who only turns to a masking tool occasionally, it wasn’t a good fit at all. Here’s my pitiful results using Vertus Fluid Mask 3.

For such an expensive program, these results are quite disappointing.
As you can see in the image at the top of this review, Topaz Remask 2 gives a much better result than anything else we’ve tried here. And it took less time–by far–than any of these methods. Here’s how it works. Remask 2 lives in your plugins folder, and you access it via Filter > Topaz Labs > Topaz Remask 2. But you’ll want to duplicate your background layer before getting started. If you don’t, you’ll get an error message. (Hopefully Topaz will change this so that it works more like the Nik Filters, creating a duplicate layer with a layer mask automatically). Drag your Background down to the Duplicate Layer icon in the Layers palette, and then click on the Layer Mask icon in the Layers palette. It should look like this.

Drag the icon on the Background layer (mini image of your photo) to the Duplicate Layer icon. Then, click the Layer Mask icon.
Make sure your Background Copy layer is active (click it to highlight it). NOW go ahead and start up Topaz Remask, from the Filter menu. When Remask first appears, you’ll see your image with a green cast to it. Down in the bottom left, you’ll see a drop-down called “Menu.” When one of the choices under Menu is the User Manual, but it doesn’t seem to work on my Mac Pro. So, here you are, scratching your head, wondering what to do. And that’s a shame, really, since the program is so darned easy to use. Perhaps they could add a little button that brings up some brief text (or a video) showing how to get started. In lieu of that, here’s my quick start guide.

Goodness! My little boy is looking rather green!
Though Remask is very similar to Photoshop’s Extract tool, it starts by applying a “keep” color (green) to the entire image, and that may throw you. First you’ll mark the dividing line, in blue, between the keep portions and the delete portions. Use the blue paintbrush, as indicated.

Next, click on the red bucket icon, as shown below. Click anywhere in the “delete” (background) area. It fills with red.

Now click on the compute button. I choose the “High Quality” setting, since my image is only 1MB. In about two seconds, it’s done. Click on the Mask tab (shown below) to see the mask you just created. Not too shabby!

Pretty impressive results for about a minute's worth of effort, I'd say.
If you’re happy with the mask, just click OK, and you’ll find your image file has been updated. Now the layer mask has your selection mask in it. Using a layer mask this way is non-destructive, and allows you to keep working on the mask to refine it. However, there is a Magic Brush option available to you within Remask, once it has processed the initial Compute. You’ll see the checkbox become available. By using the green and red brushes in Magic Brush mode, you can explicitly tell Remask where to clean up the mask. One other adjustment you can make is to the edge hardness, which is like a feathering control.
There are some Remask 2 tutorials available on the Topaz site, but the product is so simple, I hope the above will be all you need to get going. Overall, it’s a great product, and performs nearly miraculously, even in the worst situations. If you’re looking for an easy and fast masking tool that won’t break the bank, give the free trial a spin. I think you’ll like it.











December 9th, 2009 at 2:34 pm (#)
[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Eric Yang, Jacques. Jacques said: RT @topazlabs: ReMask 2 review in Digital Image Magazine! http://is.gd/5gTVo [...]
January 15th, 2010 at 9:47 am (#)
Yes, it works very well, although, Topaz overlooked one
more refinement, to be done after You click “o.k.” on
Topaz filter. Now, You can “Select”, “load sellection”
and then “Refine edge” or play with other tools to refine
sellection.
Boza
February 21st, 2010 at 12:31 am (#)
Will the Remask 2 be included in the “bundle” from Topaz Labs?
February 21st, 2010 at 12:38 am (#)
Is there a software where one can do perspective corrections separately for the left and right side of a picture, instead of having to correct both sides at the same time?
February 23rd, 2010 at 1:48 pm (#)
@Roy Tan – I assume so, though you may want to check with Topaz to be sure.
@ Yornat – You may want to try the Skew or Distort tools in Photoshop.